Megyn Kelly, keeping 'options open,' says she might not stay at Fox News

CNN ^ | April 5, 2016 | Brian Stetler

[C19fan]

In a candid interview, Megyn Kelly says she hasn't decided whether she wants to stay at Fox News after her contract expires next year. "I don't know what's going to happen," Kelly told Variety.

[4yearlurker]

That’s great Megyn! However as a low information voter I have a suggestion for you. Get rid of the Nazi,Butch Dyke look!!

[SaraJohnson]

Sounded to me like she was pulling the old “spend more time with the family” excuse. She’s ruined her career.

[dmz]

I bet her baiting Trump was preplanned so she would be acceptable to hire at one of the big three networks.

<><><><

She really should thank Donald for this opportunity.

She was an largely unknown outside of Fox news circles until Donald (intentionally or unintentionally - jury’s out on that one) made her worthy of a 10 million dollar book advance by lavishing so much attention on her.

[Cannoneer]

I agree that Cruz or Donald or any Republican candidate, for that matter, will be unmercifully demonized by the left leaning media and Hillary in a general election. The truth does not do well in elections. That was my point.

I am just curious why Trump can't get over Megyn Kelly's one moment. I think he would have been better off dropping the indignation. He certainly has been painted by a dirtier brush before and since that moment. And as far a her question that set him off, he has done nothing to dispel the inference. He has only made things worse. In this case I don't think MK has hurt him as much as he has on his own.

[RC one]

I think he just calls it like he sees it/hears it and lacks the brain-mouth filter that professional politicians develop over the years. kelly has been downright vitriolic against trump and it’s pretty obvious that she is going after him in ways that she wouldn’t have done with, say, Jeb Bush.

[dforest]

Trump never mentions Kelly. It is she who can’t get over it.

People laughed at her.

Oh noes!!!

[Cannoneer]

POINT is. She should have never been the catalyst for his perceived misogyny. His lack of preparation for the question, the so called filter, is the issue. If not her, someone would have eventually taken up the mantle.

Perception or not, his bullying and name calling invective may be cute for awhile, but it eventually gets tiresome. Substance is all I ask. Get deeper into the policy weeds and give me some meat. I am still looking for strength, all the distractions, weaknesses, need to go.

[Cannoneer]

I am not a woman.

I do not know anyone of the GOPe.

I have 2 daughters I would protect with my life.

However, had I the chance, I probably would have asked the same question of Mr. Trump knowing his reputation. He should have responded as he would to the father of a woman he wished to date.

[dforest]

Trump does all the time. People just don’t listen. because they don’t want to.

[Cannoneer]

The only thing he posits, different than his main opponent, is his recent plan to fund the wall. I think this is the thing that he needs to do more of. Stopping funds xfers to Mexico is a brilliant idea. But, we need more brilliance. He needs to get deeper in the weeds of how to improve the economy. That is the big issue and deserves more details. I know the immigration issue lights a lot of fires but the economy is what he needs to hammer on and more effectively.

I don't know how he can decouple from the world he lives in, big business/ wall street, and take up the banner for the most important section of our economy, the small business.

Can he be the arbiter of tax reformation. IDK

[Nachoman]

Megyn Kelly; the Connie Chung of Fox News.