You have no evidence. Just supposition. In fact, we have two pretenders who came later, one who may have been Richard of York but I don’t tend to believe in pretenders although one very good historian (Ann Wroe) does. I believe they escaped to Gipping Hall (where they were seen with their mother after Richard ascended the throne) and then to Scarborough and then onto the continent. Not unusual for royal children to be shipped to the continent during upheavals. His brother, George’s kids, also made that journey in earlier times. But this is supposition as well.
No one wanted a child king after the disaster of Henry 6.
Regarding the bones of the small children discovered in the tower, do you have any ideas who they may have been?
Supposing the boys were murdered, I’ve seen both Margaret Beaufort and Henry VII listed as the possible guilty party with one historian leaning towards Henry. Thoughts on this? After study, I’m starting to find Richard III a much more sympathetic character, and dont believe he had need to murder the boys.
I find the War of the Roses captivating history. It’s doubly so since my genealogy shows descent from major players of this time-—if the genealogy is correct. Ha.