Responding to the above question? What evidence would you possibly have that Finicum didn't have his semi-auto handgun with him when he stepped out of the vehicle? Let me guess - one of the vehicle occupants said that he left his guns at the refuge?
What evidence would you possibly have that he did have the gun on him ?
Since he carries both the revolver on hip in a holster, and he carries the semi-auto in a side holster (as you stated and showed a picture of), why wouldn't he at least have the side holster on and the semi-auto in it ?
Just because the FBI says they found it in his pocket doesn't mean it was there. The FBI agents on scene are now being investigated for lying (about the shots fired). Why wouldn't they continue to lie ?
Why would a guy who openly carries using holsters not be wearing a holster and have the gun slipped into a pocket ? It makes no sense, given the situation he was in.
In the video, the other male says "where are the guns". I can't be sure if he meant guns stored in the vehicle, or whether he was referring to the guns being pointed at them just as they prepared to take off.
Is it possible that Finicum did not have his gun in his pocket ? That it was in the vehicle (it was allegedly a gun one of his family (son in law?) gave to him as a present). Is it possible the FBI found it in the vehicle and placed it in his pocket to help cover up for why they shot him ? Even if they just THOUGHT he was pulling a gun ?
Well bluebird what evidence do you have that a weapon was not planted on Mr. Finicum? Just because your FBI buddies told something does not necessarily make it true.