Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnG45

No, you are counting caucuses, which are funky little insider games, not traditional elections.


29 posted on 03/07/2016 4:46:45 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker
No, you are counting caucuses, which are funky little insider games, not traditional elections.

So what? Polls before those events predicted Trump wins, did they not? And Trump lost.

If you watch the post-primary election results (most of which are traditional elections) the pundits are constantly referring to, Candidate X won by 9.0% beating what the pre-election polls suggested by 4.0% which is a good sign for the candidate.

I repeat, polls are unreliable.

32 posted on 03/07/2016 5:22:39 AM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson