[RitaOK]

BS.

Cruz posed as *anti-establishment* just beginning when he left the Bush campaign behind and loaded his ambition onto the TEA PARTY train taking hold in TEXAS.

Before that there are NO accounts of Cruz being even marginally religious, and lots of accounts that he was more John Roberts moderate/liberal, and who Bush aides claim Cruz pushed for the Supreme Court.

You don’t join forces wrapped in Goldman Sachs connections through the Counsel on Foreign Relations, the Bush team and wifey writing up the North American Union agenda for “friendliness” to South America, and get to call your dang self anti-establishment.

Cruz is a player.

[infowarrior]

You don’t join forces wrapped in Goldman Sachs connections through the Counsel on Foreign Relations, the Bush team and wifey writing up the North American Union agenda for “friendliness” to South America, and get to call your dang self anti-establishment.

Also, don't forget that much of that policy paper had to do with "free movement of labor." 'Free movement of labor'= open borders. We have, at this point in time, both *porous* (not officially legally open borders, but pretty darn close to that), and a large welfare state. Milton Friedman said you can have one, or the other, but not both. He was eminently correct on this, human nature being as it is. Something has to give here, so what is it going to be?

the infowarrior