You are a very, very poor debater.
You assert that a person said something. You are called on it because the quote you attributed is false. Then you try to pretend that someone not saying something can only be disproved by showing he said the opposite thing. Go watch a youtube video on logic and come back and try again.
Here is your EXACT quote:
“The guy Cruz came right out and said would be an acceptable president—Rubio!”
What Cruz did was compare Rubio with Trump. Cruz asserted that Rubio was a better candidate and would make a better president than Trump.
We can debate the merits of his position, one I disagree with, but your framing of his comment falsely portrays what he said. You are like the others who posted claims that Cruz “endorsed” Rubio. You guys are the same ones who denounced Cruz as a liar because his campaign implied Carson was dropping out after Iowa. You need to apply the same standards to yourselves.
A lot of people would prefer Rubio to Sanders or Clinton. He is not a good or even “acceptable” choice to me. However, ALL of the candidates have pledged to support the Republican nominee.
You ignored my second post. Cruz put himself in the EXACT same category as Rubio. Are you saying Cruz doesn’t find himself acceptable?
‘You guys are the same ones who denounced Cruz as a liar because his campaign implied Carson was dropping out after Iowa.’
Implied?
IMPLIED???
What are you smoking? There was no implication. Or have you not listened to the voicemails that were sent to Every Single Caucus Location?
I bought the LIE that the Cruz campaign only repeated what CNN reported. Then I listened to the voicemails. They flat out state as fact that Carson is suspending his campaign. It is a LIE. CNN NEVER reported that. In fact, CNN reported that Carson was NOT suspending his campaign.
Listen to the voicemails. Then explain why heads in the Cruz camp didn’t roll. Anyone with an ounce of integrity would have fired the lying liar who sent those voicemails. Period.