Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: henkster
What I've come down to is I would actually trade a decision finding Texas has no standing if the Court would expressly overrule Massachussetts v. EPA

You know, I think I would make that same deal, but to include the part ruling that CO2 is a pollutant that can be regulated by the CAA. What utter stuff and nonsense.

77 posted on 03/14/2016 11:51:50 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker
Yes, the additional part directing the EPA to declare CO2 a "pollutant" would have to be part of the decision. Otherwise, it would kill West Virginia v. EPA which is pending before the D.C. Circuit.

But even so, it will take a Trump presidency to end the EPA reign of terror. Will he actually do it? I don't know. But I do know that the second president Clinton most assuredly would not.

78 posted on 03/14/2016 12:16:10 PM PDT by henkster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson