And as illustration of this, think back to National Association of Manufacturers v. Sebelius and tell me you weren't hoping for an activist Court to strike down 0bamacare as unconstitutional. Today, take a look at the case of United States v. Texas, which is currently pending before the Supreme Court. Ask yourself: "What decision do I want to see from the Court?" As someone who posts here, the odds are pretty high you are hoping the Supreme Court will uphold the 5th Circuit decision enjoining the 0bama regime from pursuing the DAPA policy of blanket grant of legal status without Congressional authorization.
So if the Court rules in favor of Texas, and limits 0bama's power, are you going to rail against them as a "judicial oligarchy?" Or do you want them to rein themselves in, and allow 0bama to continue his Imperial Presidency unchecked?
My head hurts!
Well, to more than sixty million dead babies, the fallacy of judicial supremacy is a pretty serious problem. It’s quite a threat to the next sixty million potential victims as well.
The continued destruction of marriage and the natural family, the most fundamental building block of our civilization, wrought via the coup d’etat that is being executed by the judicial supremacists, is pretty major as well.
Don’t get me wrong, all branches of government that are operating outside their legitimate authority must be reined in.