It read to me that he was giving a speculative explanation for why Trump did not give an absolute yes or no answer. How that can be seen as anything other than giving Trump a reasonable out is beyond me.
When you make accusations you don’t come up with explanations that undercut the accusation with directly contradictory possibilities. That makes no sense at all.
How am I supposed to explain the notion Rush said that Trump didn’t disavow Duke immediately because he’s worried and he didn’t want to turn off of potential voters
Like Duke voters
Don’t worry
They’ve seen this
Hell parse or explain it all tomorrow just like he did the Schumer Linda secret meeting today