Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TheThirdRuffian

If the NY Times had a bombshell story since Jan 5th...why did have they sat on it for nearly 2 months


35 posted on 02/29/2016 1:01:01 PM PST by calisurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: calisurfer

“If the NY Times had a bombshell story since Jan 5th...why did have they sat on it for nearly 2 months”

I would assume they would want the most liberal Republican they can get, given Hillary is a terrible candidate.


48 posted on 02/29/2016 1:04:05 PM PST by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Trump, and Rubio are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: calisurfer
If the NY Times had a bombshell story since Jan 5th...why did have they sat on it for nearly 2 months

Like one of those delusional Bill Kristol tweets that gets it wrong all the time.

50 posted on 02/29/2016 1:04:11 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: calisurfer

Two reasons.

One it was off the record.

Two they will still release it after Trump gets the nomination. They want Hillary to win and best chance for her is for Trump to win the GOP nomination. Regardless if you agree with that or not that IS what the liberals think. They want Trump to win. Of course we thought Obama would be easy to beat as well.


98 posted on 02/29/2016 1:17:47 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson