Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HollyB

It has already been said on this thread-and others-by numerous posters-but, once again-

There was no evidence of foul play-none at all-Scalia lived large-he was overweight, liked to party, eat and drink-he liked to smoke cigars and a pipe, and he wasn’t much on exercise. He had a history of heart problems, like so many overweight people do.

His family said no autopsy, and even if he was someone important, his mortal remains belong to the family-not to the government or the public to carve up to please conspiracy theorists-who wouldn’t believe the results in any case-with no reasonable suspicion of foul play, you can’t overrule a family just to satisfy a morbidly curious public.


93 posted on 02/16/2016 12:53:42 PM PST by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Texan5

Yup, he was almost 80 years old, had more chins than a Hong Kong phone book and refused to listen to family, friends and doctors that begged him to take better care of himself and he knew if he died during the Obama administration he would be replaced with an Alinsky disciple.

99 posted on 02/16/2016 1:07:49 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: Texan5

> His family said no autopsy, and even if he was someone important, his mortal remains belong to the family-not to the government or the public to carve up to please conspiracy theorists....

If an autopsy is ordered by a Justice of the Peace or Medical Examiners as part of an death inquest the consent of the family is not required. See Texas CCP 49.31

source: http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CR/htm/CR.49.htm


103 posted on 02/16/2016 1:13:19 PM PST by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: Texan5
Everything you said is correct. However, We still do not know. We can only speculate and make assumptions. I still believe an autopsy and toxicology screen should have been done first thing. If I was in the same power as he was with a hate club as he had - I would want one done. I am fighting cancer. I would not want people to say - hey, she had health issues, that's why she died. Perfect way to deflect. I can't force anything, his family has the right to do as they wish - so that's a non is a non issue. However, I will state on this forum what I believe should have been done - and that is an autopsy and screening for any injections or inhalants.
116 posted on 02/16/2016 2:09:57 PM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: Texan5

After all we’ve seen occur in this country in the last couple decades, particularly in the last 7 years, how can you still call people who question the official story “conspiracy theorists”? That’s how naive people talk.


147 posted on 02/16/2016 9:22:27 PM PST by uncitizen (TRUMP THE SYSTEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson