Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kuznicki: Trump Tries To Hide His Eminent Domain Beliefs
Conservative Review ^ | 2/9/2016 | Jen Kuznicki

Posted on 02/09/2016 3:09:51 PM PST by conservativejoy

Jeb Bush nailed Donald Trump on eminent domain on Saturday night, albeit in his usual inarticulate way. In response, Trump shushed him, perhaps because Jeb was getting a little too close to exposing the establishment crony capitalist that Trump is being revealed as.

After recalling that Trump had,in a previous interview, said that he loved eminent domain, one of the moderators at the debate asked Trump if that policy would be appropriate to use for a hydroelectric power line called the Northern Pass.

Initially, Trump didn't answer the question, but rather claimed that eminent domain was an "absolute necessity" for a country, because without it we wouldn't have any infrastructure. He then disparaged conservatives for being for the Keystone Pipeline but against eminent domain, and argued that the pipeline wouldn't "go 10 feet" without the policy. Trump followed up and said that people are given a fortune for their property when bought out through the condemnation procedures of eminent domain.

Right after that, Jeb Bush jumped in and said that the Donald didn’t understand the difference between eminent domain for public use and eminent domain for private business. He recalled the fact that Donald Trump attempted take an elderly lady’s home so that he could expand his own private business. Of course, that's when Trump attacked Jeb personally, smacking him for trying to be a "tough guy" and shushing him. But Trump stayed with the Keystone Pipeline case, asserting that it was a private job—just like his limousine parking lot, so it's basically the same thing. After a back and forth between what these two men think is the right designation for the Keystone Pipeline, Trump said the following:

TRUMP: You wouldn't have massive - excuse me, Josh - you wouldn't have massive factories without eminent domain.

Which brings us to Michigan, where the primaries will land on March 8th. In 1981, General Motors used eminent domain to build a Cadillac plant near Hamtramck in a section called "Poletown." GM would close two other facilities in the greater Detroit area. They made a deal with the city government to purchase around 500 acres for the new plant. The move would displace 4,200 residents, some six churches and a whopping 140 businesses in a sweeping case of forced property relinquishment. The now sarcastically labeled "Government Motors" has of course not been able to produce the promises made then of 6,000 high-paying jobs and perhaps 24,000 more in economic offshoots; there is also the little matter of them being bailed out by the United States government after failing and going broke. In the Donald Trump/GM world, the displaced residents got "a fortune" for relinquishing their homes, so what's the big deal?

If Trump/GM can use government to transfer your property to their own holdings, there is essentially no protection for private property rights.

In 1981, the Poletown case went before the Michigan Supreme Court, who in a 5-2 decision, said that eminent domain allows the government to force private landowners to sell their property to benefit another private entity, and equated public use with public purpose. Public use, as in roads and bridges, and public purpose, as in tax income, jobs and the socialized system for the poor.

But that Michigan Supreme Court case, made in haste to move the project forward, was unanimously overturned in 2004, in Wayne v. Hathcock. At the time, Justice Robert P. Young Jr. wrote, "[W]e must overrule Poletown in order to vindicate our Constitution [and] protect the people's property rights..." In Michigan, the Trump/GM way of doing business is unlawful.

The big deal here is sovereignty. If Trump/GM can use government to transfer your property to their own holdings, there is essentially no protection for private property rights. In that scenario, you are no longer sovereign with things that you own, but a serf who can be ejected at will from wherever you put down roots. In the view of Donald Trump, "the greater good" overrules individual freedom. His eminent domain stance is far outside the realm of the republican form of government, the guiding philosophy of the United States of America, which emphasizes limited government, private property rights and self-governance. But in order to muddy the waters about what Trump actually believes, he threw up the Keystone Pipeline as if it is the same thing. In his muddled, inarticulate way, Jeb Bush was right.

But researchers and policy analysts also point out that when the government partners with business, it is often to cover up damage made from their own failed policies in the face of economic downturns and poorly managed public funds. The Poletown takings caused more economic destruction than the plant created, and Detroit is as close to what can be described as a failed government mecca as any you can think of. In that kind of world, all the politicians and their business cronies have to do is condemn a few hundred acres, shut off city services, and let the garbage pile up on the streets and viola!... people tend to want to take the money.

So, I no longer want to hear some passenger on the Trump Train tell me that Trump's not a skilled politician and that he's beholden to no one. He has deflected from his role in trying to force a lady to sell her home so that he could personally benefit. He used political maneuvering to make it so, a well-hewn political straw man argument to sell it, leaving us to recall all of his donations to certain Democratic politicians who were "there for him" when he needed them.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: cjtds; conservativeview; jeb; jenkuznicki; marklevin; nevertrump; nevertrumper; nevertrumpers; nevertrumpertrolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: conservativejoy

You might want to read this before you screw your own candidate:

http://www.sptimes.com/2005/03/01/Floridian/Standing_his_ground.shtml


21 posted on 02/09/2016 3:39:06 PM PST by old curmudgeon (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster
A pipeline isn’t the same thing as a casino, a golf course, or other BS government subsidized project that Trump has tried to impose on several occasions.

Pure BS. Keep spinning, fool.

22 posted on 02/09/2016 3:46:33 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nurse-rn

Arlington Stadium was built a good thirty years before the Ballpark in Arlington was built in its parking lot. Any condemnation proceedings were for streets and access roads.

The Bush family had nothing to do with the original construction in the sixties making your statement false.


23 posted on 02/09/2016 3:49:05 PM PST by Oklahoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

No spin, do your homework instead of trolling...

http://anewdomain.net/2015/07/23/donald-trumps-achilles-heel-eminent-domain-property-seizure/

http://www.times-news.com/opinion/before-you-vote-for-trump-ask-the-scots-about-him/article_826141b4-3488-11e5-85ab-17bd91262e71.html


24 posted on 02/09/2016 3:58:07 PM PST by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

Private use is private use...besides Cruz was pro-ED with just compensation before he was against it.

You sure as heck aren’t going to build a border wall without it either.


25 posted on 02/09/2016 4:12:18 PM PST by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
You sure as heck aren’t going to build a border wall without it either.

uh oh, strong hard fact alert :)

26 posted on 02/09/2016 4:20:11 PM PST by onona (Where are you tonight, my sweet Marie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
Apples, meet oranges....


27 posted on 02/09/2016 4:30:56 PM PST by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster
Taking private property for personal profit was never the intended use. There is not any excuse for his repeatedly using government cronies he has bribed to seize private property.

Ah... Finally someone gets it.

28 posted on 02/09/2016 4:36:42 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

If you lived in a dying town with 60% unemployment, a bankrupt city government, and someone was willing to open a business that would provide thousands of jobs, you might feel differently. I sympathize with both sides of the argument.


29 posted on 02/09/2016 5:07:47 PM PST by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man St anding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

I stopped reading anything by Jen a few years ago, when she got nailed to a wall by Dr. Kevin Gutzman, as matter she came down to name calling and using horrible, language.


30 posted on 02/09/2016 7:00:43 PM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Vote Tom Hoefling of America's Party for President the only person to restore the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson