Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativejoy

I want to have a tax plan that takes away as much regulatory power from gov’t bureaucracies as possible.

The tax code has been used throughout American history to regulate in areas where direct regulation would be unconstitutional. The courts have generally allowed tax regulation, the latest example being Roberts finding for Obamacare as a permisssible taxing function. There are plenty of other examples in history as well.

Freedom has to take precedence over tax plans that are designed to further social engineering goals, however praiseworthy (e.g., “stimulating investment”). Anyway, freedom is the best stimulus.

So I’d go for Huckabee’s national sales tax as the least regulatory as long as it’s kept simple.


11 posted on 02/06/2016 10:59:10 AM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MUDDOG; conservativejoy
So I'd go for Huckabee's national sales tax as the least regulatory as long as it's kept simple.

A consumption tax is a nice idea but it would need a constitutional amendment repealing the 16th amendment to get me to support its implementation. I also sort of suspect you need an amendment to permit the federal government to impose such a tax.

I also have a moral aversion to impressing retailers in to government service as tax collectors.

25 posted on 02/06/2016 1:05:44 PM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: MUDDOG

I heard today that: the GOP will HAVE to raise taxes until revenues are up. To do otherwise is irresponsible.


29 posted on 02/06/2016 1:17:40 PM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson