Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RC one
It is widely accepted that the constitution is written in the language of the English Common law and the English Common law is clear as to what a Natural Born Citizen is and isn't.

It may be widely accepted among today's ignorami, but it certainly wasn't at the time of the founding.

"George Mason IV (December 11, 1725 - October 7, 1792) a delegate from Virginia to the U.S. Constitutional Convention, who is called the "Father of the Bill of Rights," had said during the debate on ratification in Virginia that the Constitution was not founded on English common law through a single example on treaties, bluntly stated that English common law was not the common law of the United States."

Link

51 posted on 02/06/2016 3:17:57 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: John Valentine

I did not say that the common law of England is the Common law of the United States though, did I? I said the constitution is “written in the language of the English common law” and it most certainly is. that does not mean that English common law is the common law of the United States; however, the English Common Law most definitely was the law of this land from 1607 until until 1788 so there is no denying its influence over our law.


60 posted on 02/06/2016 3:35:50 AM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson