[RC one]

Three elections in a row with candidates of increasingly questionable eligibility and now we have an openly foreign born candidate running and you’re going to sit there and act like this is a straw man argument? I call BS. thgere’s a clear pattern of subversion at work here. It is clear as day light that the eligibility clause is being willfully eroded.

[Popman]

there’s a clear pattern of subversion at work here. It is clear as day light that the eligibility clause is being willfully eroded.

Really ? Seriously ?

So some unseen power made sure Obama in 2004 and 2008, Romney in 2012 were the nominees to subvert the eligibility clause?

Again, I ask, where does Cruz allegiance lie ?

That is the intent of all the root arguments being made against him...

[Cboldt]

-- and you're going to sit there and act like this is a straw man argument? --

I found it so ridiculous on its face, that it wasn't even necessary to remark. "The idea that some foreign born entity will somehow get elected POTUS is really a strawman argument" - said while foreign-born (strawman?) Cruz is being advanced!

As for winning over the American people, I give you Obama, twice. To think some other foreign-born and raised Mohammedan can't get a majority of the electoral college sometime in the future is Pollyanna.