To: JoSixChip
I dread Rubio’s sudden “surge”.
Something is very wrong here.
I always assumed Cruz would take Iowa but Rubio?
My gut warns me that he is the going to be the nominee, whether we will or it not.
73 posted on
02/01/2016 7:59:19 PM PST by
Salamander
(I made friends with a lot of people in the danger zone...)
To: Salamander
My gut warns me that he is the going to be the nominee, whether we will or it not.
I'm certainly not there yet, and I don't believe cruz has a shot at it ether. But then again, I did think Trump would carry Iowa.
80 posted on
02/01/2016 8:04:12 PM PST by
JoSixChip
(Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - losers are not winners)
To: Salamander
I think dem’s operation chaos. Only explanation for low turnout on the dem side. It appears Rubio did really great and received the majority of votes in the larger (more Urban?) areas. “HeHe...lets vote Rubio.” And of course, that’s playing right into the GOPe hands. And the media (fox cnn msnbc etc.), they are all falling in line and propping Rubio up. Disgusting!!
118 posted on
02/01/2016 8:30:53 PM PST by
mouse1
To: Salamander
Counties surrounding Des Moine are leftist! Not surprised leftist uniparty Rubio did well there. The low lying fruit candidates need to get out of the running.
119 posted on
02/01/2016 8:31:28 PM PST by
Lopeover
(2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson