Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Nextrush

“Safe conduct” does not mean “immunity from prosecution.”


8 posted on 01/30/2016 5:18:36 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake

They did seem to want to be ‘pardoned’ as the media reported implying to me they did not want to be charged if they left refuge. I’m sorry I didn’t write it that way.


13 posted on 01/30/2016 5:25:25 AM PST by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS, REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake
Safe conduct is the situation in time of international conflict or war where one state, a party to such conflict, issues to a person, usually an enemy state's subject, a pass or document to allow the enemy alien to traverse its territory without harassment, bodily harm, or fear of death.

Roadblocks, multiple gunshots, and then bleeding to death. I'd say the FBI violated the promise of safe conduct, with a very high level of harassment and bodily harm, followed by a painful death. My level of trust for anyone who willingly does Obama's work is exactly what followers of any petty tyrant deserve. The outcome in Oregon shows that an absence of trust is fully justified.

21 posted on 01/30/2016 5:42:46 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson