[SampleMan]

I split my time 50-50 now. Half to attacking Trump for not being a Constitutionalist and half to defending Trump as a far superior option to Clinton and Sanders.

A hell of a poltical issue.

[sergeantdave]

“I split my time 50-50 now. Half to attacking Trump for not being a Constitutionalist and half to defending Trump as a far superior option to Clinton and Sanders.”

You might need more time.

STEPHEN HAWKING: How to build a time machine

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1269288/STEPHEN-HAWKING-How-build-time-machine.html#ixzz3y219EoMA

[Finny]

With respect, defending any Republican against Democrats, Clinton or Sanders, is spinning hamster wheels in the primary season.

The primaries are to advance conservatism in the Republican party. Trump deserves attack in that realm, as his history and even his current words confirm him to be a big government "negotiating" kinda guy. He's long been inclined in that direction. Why defend that? Against junk lefties like Sanders (that's probably who it will be)?

Cruz is a great opportunity to advance real limited government Constitutional conservatism. Trump bodes "negotiating" on the Constitution, more of the same. Cruz bodes (for the entrenched in power) implementing the Constitution to get rid of excess government. What Cruz brings is what's necessary to turn things right.

If Trump gets the nomination, I will be praying for a strong 3rd party candidate.