I subscribe to the view of Davidovits (another French researcher) that the inner blocks were not quarried, but poured concrete (not the kind we make today). His view is IMHO a necessity; it is also compatible with internal ramps, and all other hypotheses (other than the “Giza Power Plant” nonsense) and models of the construction — but the reverse is not true, the other hypotheses can’t work without Davidovits and his geopolymerization.
I was just thinking it could just be sand and the slopes of the sides are related to the angle of repose.
When they scrape what’s left of Gospodin Putin off of anything, he will have been replaced by someone as bad or worse, as usual in Russian politics. But the Russians don’t look at it as we do - they want a strong leader who will defend the motherland at all costs.
I thought that the ‘poured in place’ theory had pretty much been debunked as the internal structure of a poured stone is much different that a naturally occuring stone; and no one has found an actual ‘poured’ stone.
Poured stones may exist, but no one has found one that can be proved to have been poured.