Looks like settled law to me.
I get to the same place, just using the US constitution (no resort to Vattel, British common law, etc.).
OK, I misunderstood. I thought you were using it to support eligibility, which is why I said it wasn’t dispositive.
At this point, I have significant questions about his eligibility, and am looking for something that sets my mind at ease. So far I haven’t seen it. And so far, you’ve supplied the most useful material.