Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic Caucus 2016 Open Discussion Thread
Free Republic ^ | 20 January 2016 | Windflier

Posted on 01/20/2016 12:07:10 AM PST by Windflier

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 last
To: DoughtyOne
If anyone has questions, I'd be happy to answer them.

Just wondering if you are automating the validation / counting process with software tools, or is it all manual?

101 posted on 01/21/2016 12:13:54 PM PST by Company Man (Keep Calm and Carry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
This election is about ending the siege upon freedom for Americans living in the USA as we are on the brink of being overrun.

THAT is the sole reason that Trump is running away with this primary.

He was keen enough to identify the number one issue of the American people, then boldly enter the race with an ironclad promise to totally eliminate that problem from our lives.

The rest of the field then played 'catch up' and 'me too' politics, when they realized they'd incorrectly positioned themselves, vis a vis, the chief concerns of the voters.

Unfortunately for them, the American people know real leadership when they see it, and are in no mood to accept substitutes.

102 posted on 01/21/2016 12:16:57 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

TRUMP THE VOTE!

TRUMP 2016!


103 posted on 01/21/2016 12:52:15 PM PST by LibertarianLeaning
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle; DoughtyOne
I need clarification.

I'm not in any way "officially" involved with the caucus, but I have some tentative answers:

The results for each day's voting thread will be on that thread? Because thereafter there was discussion on the thread, after the results. Then people began voting on it again.

So I am lost as to where I am allowed to comment on the day's voting.

And what about those votes after the comments? Were they meant for the next day's voting?

I suppose that the late discussion was within the intentions of the thread, but the people who "began voting on it again" and cast "those votes after the comments" were doing so on the wrong daily thread (they should've voted on the thread for the 21st). Their votes will probably be either not counted at all or tallied simply as irregularities, without being added to the candidates' total votes for the proper day (again, the 21st).

Maybe we need to keep this commentary thread a running thread, and post the results only on IT so people can discuss the results?

I can see placing the results on a commentary thread (with a link at the end of the daily voting threads), though of course I won't be deciding in the place of DoughtyOne.

And stay strong with the NOTHING BUT THE TWO WORDS on the actual daily voting thread?

I agree. The instructions are in clear language in the original post (the options are even spelled out), and the procedure is easy to follow. I wouldn't like to make concessions that would force a manual count of hundreds of posts.

104 posted on 01/21/2016 2:36:18 PM PST by Lonely Bull ("When he is being rude or mean it drives people _away_ from his confession and _towards_ yours.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

“the American people know real leadership when they see it”

Then how did we end up with a President Obama? Oh yeah, that’s right...he was sooo “Presidential”.


105 posted on 01/22/2016 1:51:43 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
...how did we end up with a President Obama?

For most of the last hundred years, the White House has swung on an eight year pendulum between the two major parties. Only rarely, has either party managed to hold on to the presidency for more than two consecutive terms.

After eight years of a Republican president who was reviled by the left, and barely tolerated by the right, it was almost a foregone conclusion that the Dems would take the White House back in '08.

Do recall that our side didn't have a VP who was widely perceived to be the natural successor to the sitting president, nor did the Republicans run a dynamic, attractive nominee in 2008.

The Dems had the weight of the 'pendulum' on their side, and they put up a (seemingly) dynamic, attractive nominee, to boot. We never stood a chance, under those circumstances.

106 posted on 01/22/2016 12:47:28 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Good analysis.

And upon grabbing the WH, the Dems used massive deficit spending to reward their constituencies (both crony capitalists and entitlement army) insuring re-election in 2012.


107 posted on 01/22/2016 12:51:42 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
...upon grabbing the WH, the Dems used massive deficit spending to reward their constituencies (both crony capitalists and entitlement army) insuring re-election in 2012.

Yep, and it didn't help that the Republicans picked yet another uninspiring RINO to run against Zero.

It's almost as if the GOP-e wanted to lose...

108 posted on 01/22/2016 12:58:37 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I chalk it up to low-information voters and fraud. Nothing will ever change my mind about that.


109 posted on 01/23/2016 5:02:42 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson