You got that right.
Here, have a hat
Levin is really a conservative.
Trumpees are not conservative. No slight intended, it is just the truth. You aren’t the first to diss Levin. You just used more words.
You need to listen to this interview by Rush. Asked about Trump, he said he has brought some issues to national attention. When asked about Cruz he gushed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKObsoCMMXE
Don’t give up your day job.
I like Trump. I love Cruz, and love Levin.
He called out those who are attacking Cruz from the left, and we all know that he meant Trump. Hell, some of his supporters right here on this site are trying to scratch up some traction from a New York Times pathetic smear piece which Levin called a huge nothing.
Mark also said it would be interesting to watch tonight's debate to see if any of the candidates would try a leftwing attack.
If you interpret that as a sign that Levin is losing it, then, yeah...I'd say you ARE a"nut for the cult of personality."
For what its worth, I haven’t watched Fox since Beck left.
Mark Levin is a serious and real conservative. He is driven by conservative principles and a deep knowledge of and respect for our Constitution and laws.
No one knows where Trump is on many issues. He is a newly converted “Conservative” who says many unConservative things. A man like Levin will point this out and should.
Your writing style is great. Very interesting post.
This “attack from the left” thing is kooky.
The Obama BC was an “attack from the right”, not the left, although Hillary started it, she dropped it and we on the right attacked for good reason.
I guess any attack lately is an “attack from the left” if it is about Cruz.
An “attack from the right” must mean you cannot attack at all.
I rarely get to hear Levin. If the conditions are just right I can pick him up but most times reception is terrible when he comes on.
Personally, I wish his show would play when Beck’s does or even in Hannity’s spot. Beck lost me a long time ago and Hannity, well with out getting into great specificity, is boring and lacks depth.
Their hearts have always been Cruz. But Trump was useful to talk radio for a while. Trump muddied the water to the point the more mainstream republicans got lost in it. That was useful to talk radio. While no Beck fan, he was probably the first to turn against Trump. But now the real battle is beginning to be Cruz vs Trump. And the talkers have always really been Cruz supporters. To talk radio, Trump was a simply a useful side show that most figured would have fizzled long before now. It didn’t. And if you’ve listened closely you’ve noticed a tone change toward Trump. With the exception of Beck, who has simply come out against Trump, you’re beginning to hear little things here and there that ding Trump on talk radio. Not biggie things. Not harped on. But things mentioned in passing that are not the usual protections extended to the favored candidates. Little things here and there. As things amp up and get closer, you’ll hear more favoritism toward Cruz. Maybe not outright support, but read between the lines support.
When I have to read six paragraphs—and STILL don’t know what the article is about...
I think there’s wagons circling at this point, Beck and Levin and Limbaugh are all communicating with each other.
Levin fed Limbaugh information from Washington in Rush’s early days.
Levin in ‘inside the beltway’ in other words.
“Inside the beltway’ only sees R’s and D’s and nothing else but R’s and D’s. And the R is always better than the D in the end.
God Bless Mark Levin but I don’t have to agree with him although if he just came and talked like I do saying “I support Ted Cruz” that would be great.
There’s some sort of consensus that Cruz is the best man at this point.
In political terms Cruz has to win early stuff. With so many southern states where Cruz is strongest on the table before March 15th Cruz is forced to fight to win or else he loses.
What’s a conservative? If you side with the Ginsburg side of the court instead of Scalia’s side - are you a conservative?
Trust no talk show host. They are only in it for your ears.
No matter how much anyone would like to see him win, IMO - Trump can’t win in a general election. (unless Hillary is indicted by Oct)
I’m not sure what Levin’s problem is, but if he’s referring to Trump pointing out a potential problem with Cruz-z-z’s citizenship as an “attack from the left,” then he’s already gone full court TDS.
I dont do crowds for anybody in fact the larger the crowd the more I avoid getting emotional sucked in. The country elected a svengali in 2008 and may well elect another one in 2016 replacing one king with another.
Landing at the bottom of a cliff still hurts no matter what screaming crowd your in.
If you can explain what you candidate will do or not do then the choice is based on reason. I see lots of drama and emotion around Trump not much reason. Just my 2 words. I dont dis anyone that supports him I get it. Just no clue how he would restore our constitutional liberty, but I hear it will be YYYUUUUGGGEE
You got that right.
Here, have a hat
Freerepublic.com is going DU.
I’m done with Levin. Listened to him for years, bought his books, gave credence to his opinions, but no more. Levin is an out and out flak for Cruz but won’t say he is. If Levin wants to endorse Ted, fine. That’s his choice. But to sit there day after day and claim you are neutral when you are not is being intellectually dishonest with your audience. But of course Levin needs ratings, so if he endorsed anyone outright, he’d lose part of his audience. And CR is all but an extension of the Cruz campaign, which Levin happens to be the editor of and plugs relentlessly. Levin is stuck in 1982, and if he’s not hawking books or his father’s books he’s screaming at the top of his lungs at anyone and everyone. He’s grown to be a tiresome act.
I think Shiva Fan has gone Beck.