Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sbMKE

Thanks.

§1924. Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
(b) For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a).
(c) In this section, the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.

This is the statute, I believe, for which Gen. Petraeus was convicted.

But I’m not sure that “knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location” pertains to removing the classified markings off the documents themselves.

Rather, it addresses the act of taking classified documents from a secure approved location and storing them at an unsecure, unapproved location.


6 posted on 01/09/2016 9:15:12 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Signalman
But I’m not sure that "knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location" pertains to removing the classified markings off the documents themselves.

Rather, it addresses the act of taking classified documents from a secure approved location and storing them at an unsecure, unapproved location.

Hillary's email server would definitely be considered an "unauthorized location".

38 posted on 01/09/2016 10:04:09 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Which Hillary and her staff and Blumenthal all did.


58 posted on 01/09/2016 1:53:50 PM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Hillary’s argument has all along been that the documents on her server were not marked classified so she could not have known that the document were classified. The email shows that she ordered the documents scrubbed of classification notices. Shows intent, prior knowledge and pants on fire lying.


60 posted on 01/09/2016 1:59:58 PM PST by Mike Darancette (CA the sanctuary state for stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson