Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: exit82

I obviously won’t vote for him, but we need to be accurate, Trump said that in 2008. If it happened 17 years ago, why is Trump mad about it now and wasn’t then? Why should Cruz be attacking Hillary for enabling her rapist husband now, since it happened 17 years ago?

Okay, I’m being obtuse. This is really what I’m trying to say: Cruz is blamable for not bringing up this issue and Trump is great because he’s talking about something that happened 17 years ago. This is how you draw the distinction between the two. But, if we’re going to bring up things that happened 17 years ago, does that mean we can bring up everything Trumps said in the past 17 years ago, that Trump had only great things to say about the Clintons, gave them a lot of money, etc.?

Then, what if Clinton just starts playing the victim card? She can’t because she’s on records saying this and that. Trump’s also on record isn’t he.

What’s really happening is you just think that distinction makes Cruz look bad to people on FR who haven’t made up their minds. It doesn’t matter that what you wrote was inaccurate, and you knew it, you thought it makes Trump look better so you wrote it.


147 posted on 01/07/2016 12:04:30 PM PST by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: demshateGod

Once again your conclusion about me is a fig newton of your imagination.

The only money I have donated this cycle is to.....wait for it....TED CRUZ.

Not once. Twice.

Hillary has brought back from the dead the whole topic of the war on women, as a current campaign issue.

Ted would be perfectly correct to bring up her hypocrisy in doing so, but he has chosen not to do so.

Trump has brought up Hillary’s hypocrisy very publicly, and neutralized her by saying how she enabled her husband to attack the women charging him with sexual assault.

Ted said he would stick to Hillary stands, and elected not to go there.

And no other Republican has followed Trump’s lead. Crickets.

So when the OP said Trump was a Clinton decoy, I asked why he felt that way. After all, it is Trump who is relentlessly and publicly attacking Hillary in every speech and interview.

And the OP has chosen not to respond to me.


152 posted on 01/07/2016 12:19:39 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: demshateGod

Once again your conclusion about me is a fig newton of your imagination.

The only money I have donated this cycle is to.....wait for it....TED CRUZ.

Not once. Twice.

Hillary has brought back from the dead the whole topic of the war on women, as a current campaign issue.

Ted would be perfectly correct to bring up her hypocrisy in doing so, but he has chosen not to do so.

Trump has brought up Hillary’s hypocrisy very publicly, and neutralized her by saying how she enabled her husband to attack the women charging him with sexual assault.

Ted said he would stick to Hillary stands, and elected not to go there.

And no other Republican has followed Trump’s lead. Crickets.

So when the OP said Trump was a Clinton decoy, I asked why he felt that way. After all, it is Trump who is relentlessly and publicly attacking Hillary in every speech and interview.

And the OP has chosen not to respond to me.


153 posted on 01/07/2016 12:19:51 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson