Err, why did you click on the thread, then?
An honest question, is that suddenly not in vogue?
Some of us will elect to try and learn something new by reading threads which look interesting and touch on subjects which we otherwise know little. In the case of this thread, I came on here to try and find a bit of background to see whether Steven Avery’s case is of interest.
Lacking any sort of context for the discussion makes the thread much less useful. For example, the documentary heavily discussed could be named, or a web source for information cited in one of the opening posts (as opposed to post 79).