Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dr_lew
It would seem to me that the STS method of parachute recovery would remain the best bet, but of course just locating and recovering the booster at sea remains an expensive propostion.

From what I have previously read about Space X, they intend to have every stage including the payload capsule return back to a landing area under it's own power. Every component will be recovered for reuse, except for fuel. They are intending to build ever larger delivery vehicles that can send 100 persons at one time, and return it to a landing area, similar to that of a commercial aircraft. Can you imagine the cost of an airplane ticket cross-country if the airplane was only used once? It's all about getting the cost way down.

7 posted on 01/01/2016 12:55:05 AM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: roadcat
Every component will be recovered for reuse, except for fuel.

But at what cost? It's a paradox, a conundrum.

8 posted on 01/01/2016 1:05:35 AM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson