Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

“You are beyond stupid. The indictment in the case you cited didn’t list 7.02. “

Direct Quote:


“The abstract portion of each charge properly explained the law of party liability under both § 7.02(a)(2) and § 7.02(b), but the application paragraph of each charge erroneously applied, to the facts of the case, only the law of parties under § 7.02(a)(2). - See more at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-criminal-appeals/1427947.html#sthash.TZXaYDPG.dpuf";


47 posted on 12/18/2015 8:36:41 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator
The direct quote that you think wins the argument for you, doesn't. It is not a direct quote from the indictment, it is a direct quote from the jury instructions/jury charge. The jury charge is a product of the trial court, not a product of the grand jury.

The indictment, on the other hand, which is what we are arguing about, is a product of the grand jury, and not a product of the trial court.

An honest person who posted as stupid as you do would be at least embarrassed. You are an idiot, and you are dishonest. If this was my website, I'd ban you outright. You add nothing positive.

48 posted on 12/18/2015 8:49:48 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson