It's obvious that my remarks are going over your pinhead.
You are the one that, in our little fuss, first used the phrase "prosecuted under 7.02." You said "But nevermind. They are not being prosecuted under 7.02 so it doesn't apply."
My first reply to that was "'Law of the parties' is never stated as the basis for a charge, it is not an offense."
You keep reverting to the sophist's point, that I once wrote "There is no such thing as 'being prosecuted under Section 7.02'" instead of my more accurate first response, 7.02 is not an offense.
You keep reverting to that point, even after I acknowledged it, as though your repetition somehow rebuts my points that 7.02 is inevitably involved in the Twin Peaks cases (even though you say it isn't), and that 7.02 is not an offense.
Idiot troll, can't even troll worth spit.
“You keep reverting to that point, even after I acknowledged it, “
I apologize. If I kept on repeating after you acknowledged your mistake, I missed it.