On January 20, 2003, an Hidalgo County grand jury returned an indictment charging appellant with one count of capital murder and one count of aggravated robbery. See Tex. Pen.Code S:S: 19.03(a)(2) & 29.03(a)(1).
Followed by the sentence you quoted, "the State sought to prove appellant's guilt, under both counts in the indictment ..." Neither of those two counts is an offense under 7.02, because there is not such thing as an offense under 7.02. However, as Vega didn't actually commit murder or aggravated robbery, the state had to invoke 7.02 in order to establish criminal responsibility for the charged offenses.
There was no count of "responsible for the criminal conduct of another," the indictment counts were murder and aggravated robbery.
Again, remarks for others, because you are too dense to understand, and unworthy of a civil or reasoned response.
“There was no count of “responsible for the criminal conduct of another,” the indictment counts were murder and aggravated robbery.”
True. BUT he was prosecuted under 7.02 also. If they didn’t prosecute under 7.02 they would have no case.
“Again, remarks for others, because you are too dense to understand, and unworthy of a civil or reasoned response. “
LOL!
For the other, even with direct quotes from state papers saying they are prosecuting under 7.02 C says you can’t prosecute under 7.02!