Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator
I forgot what a sophist you are.

At any rate, 7.02 is not an offense. It is a principle for assigning criminal responsibility.

7.01 does not describe not an offense either. It states the principle that a person who commits a crime, or is an accomplice, is criminally responsible.

With conspiracy off the table, most of the accused have to be swept in by application of 7.02. But 7.02 on its own does absolutely nothing. It requires an underlying offense.

I post this for others, because you are too stupid to understand, plus you argue in bad faith.

28 posted on 12/17/2015 4:41:51 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
"At any rate, 7.02 is not an offense. It is a principle for assigning criminal responsibility."

I repeat, you better inform the AG that his prosecutions are not valid ....

"On September 13, 2004, the State brought appellant to trial before a petit jury.   At that trial, the State sought to prove appellant's guilt, under both counts in the indictment, as a party under Texas Penal Code §§ 7.02(a)(2) and 7.02(b)

.1   - See more at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-criminal-appeals/1427947.html#sthash.oCNbxrB9.dpuf"

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-criminal-appeals/1427947.html

30 posted on 12/17/2015 4:56:02 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson