To: MtnClimber
So the spiral galaxies seem to be feeding their black hole faster than even the huge elliptical galaxies.
2 posted on
12/10/2015 8:45:38 PM PST by
MtnClimber
(For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: MtnClimber
3 posted on
12/10/2015 8:47:42 PM PST by
Fungi
To: MtnClimber
5 posted on
12/10/2015 8:51:21 PM PST by
4rcane
To: MtnClimber
Boy, and here I thought the science was settled! /s
To: MtnClimber
its probably good that black holes have a size limit
(now i only wish I did....)
13 posted on
12/10/2015 10:19:33 PM PST by
faithhopecharity
(Diff tween D's and R's is that the D's allow the poor to be corrupt, too. (O. Levsnt))
To: MtnClimber
But these discs are known to be unstable and prone to crumbling into stars. Theoretically, a black hole could grow so big
This is ALL theoretical. They do not have any specific observational information for any of this. They build hypothesis on hypothesis and then have to run back to the "ether" theorem of the 1800's and rename it black matter because all of their calculations keep coming up short.
14 posted on
12/11/2015 12:34:44 AM PST by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
To: MtnClimber
Interesting to discuss after all else is discussed. I just hope none of my tax dollars were used to create this new “fact.” Who would care?
16 posted on
12/11/2015 5:02:02 AM PST by
ThePatriotsFlag
( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else)
To: MtnClimber
Theoretically, a black hole could grow so big that it swallows up the stable part of the disc and destroys it.
Then what? Anthropomorphic Black Hole Cooling?
Did we do that?
23 posted on
12/11/2015 7:46:14 AM PST by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson