Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rusty0604

I thought this sort of case was what Obamacare was for,where you could never be judged for preexisting ailments.
The mom needs to either become his Conservator for medical matters, or look for a social worker,or a lawyer to do it.


39 posted on 12/06/2015 10:53:57 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lee martell

She’s got a lawyer, but TeWas law says the hospital, not the patient, gets to make the decision.


41 posted on 12/06/2015 10:58:31 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: lee martell

“I thought this sort of case was what Obamacare was for, where you could never be judged for preexisting ailments.”

Do you remember that conversation he had where he told a woman it might be better for her grandmother to “take a pill” than have surgery? I suspect this is more of same.

On the flip side I don’t think you can actively kill a conscious patient who doesn’t consent. I think there might be some information missing here.


44 posted on 12/06/2015 11:11:43 PM PST by PLMerite (The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: lee martell
I thought this sort of case was what Obamacare was for,where you could never be judged for preexisting ailments.

That was meant for homosexuals with AIDS, so the rest would pay for their drugs, for all those mentally and emotionally challenged welfare kids, and urban crackheads going to rehab for the umpteenth time, not for heterosexual cancer survivors and the like.

59 posted on 12/07/2015 1:27:40 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson