See Post 40. Your words backing up the original poster:
“You underestimate the pernicious duplicity of today’s media. They have gone from biased, in the 1970’s and 1980’s, to suppressers of some truths and promoters of others in the 1990’s, to strident activists in the 2000’s, to an outright Ministry of Propaganda now.”
Name calling now? A sure sign you’re losing an argument when you have to make it personal
Dude. You really DO have a reading comprehension problem. My statement didn’t even back the poster. I was noting that I wouldn’t be surprised, because of how bad the news media is.
And you admit that you cannot find a post in which I said what you claimed I said. Good. So now we know you make up quotes. You should go work for the ‘news media’! Yer a natural!
Freakin loser butthurt boy. LOL
BTW: Quick note, I name call when I am winning arguments, too.
You shiftless no-account broke-ass freak.
Hardly. Name calling is also called for when ones opponent insists on attending to superfluity and ignoring salience.