The guy was probably just running late for his anarchist meeting. Didn’t want the revolution to start without him. Or more likely, just cranked up on drugs.
Applying the 9th commandment fully doesn’t require you to ignore the facts before your face.
“The guy was probably just running late for his anarchist meeting. Didn’t want the revolution to start without him. Or more likely, just cranked up on drugs.”
“Applying the 9th commandment fully doesn’t require you to ignore the facts before your face.”
I agree. This is why the duct taping of the dog for a minute is not an issue for me. The emotion based judgmentalism of my fellow freepers is. I expect it from the left. I like to think the right is above it, at least for the most part. We are supposed to have facts and reason on our side. We shun conjecture as we judge events (and not people). And again, I put it in the context of “let he who has not sinned cast the first stone. And who, exactly, made what this woman did a sin in the first place? Who is to say? Who has that authority? Where is the phrase “duct tape” found in any law? How broadly defined do you think our laws should be?