[[As for the naysayers,]]
Yes, because ‘Naysayers’ can’t possibly have any facts that support their naysaying- right?
Not sure why you felt the need to diss those who don’t agree who bring up valid points that might counter the premise of the article? The FACT is that science isn’t settled on the issue, so calling others ‘ignorant’ for not agreeing with a small study isn’t very civil - Calling someone ignorant for simply wanting to live a life pleasing to them by enjoying the fine things in life while they are here isn’t very civil either-
I posted to WhiskeyX my support so he didn’t get discouraged enough to quit posting these articles.
I wasn’t calling anyone ignorant for wanting a good life. I was referring to those who post opinions without even a hint of actually reading this article or anything else relevant to the subject. Ignorance is lack of information, nothing more. If I were to be uncivil, I would have used the word stupid. I didn’t.