To: 21twelve
I see that you are using the term âCivil Warâ. I feel microaggressed - what about using âThe War Between the Statesâ, or âThe War of Northern Aggressionâ? (Boy that last one - talk about being âaggressedâ!)I like the term "War of 1861", which shouldn't offend anyone.
27 posted on
11/21/2015 12:57:43 PM PST by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
To: reg45
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/07/walter-e-williams/the-war-of-1861/ Thanks - I had never heard of the term “War of 1861”. Found the above link - has some interesting information of the debate going on when they were writing the Constitution. Some were for allowing secession, some were against it. (It ended up being allowed).
Although the name lacks the importance and vastness of the war. Perhaps “The Great War of 1861”. Of course then they would have come up for a different name originally given to WW I!
29 posted on
11/21/2015 1:06:15 PM PST by
21twelve
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
To: reg45
I prefer the term “recent unpleasantness”.
99 posted on
11/22/2015 6:50:13 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson