Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
You're the ONE who's trying to DISQUALIFY a qualified candidate because of his BIRTH.

Take a SERIOUS LOOK at the links below.
DID I write those Congressional Bills trying to CHANGE and REMOVE the BIRTH QUALIFICATIONS for United States President ?
    HELL NO !


For those of you who don't know, remember this:
8 Congressional attempts from June 2004 to February 2008 to alter Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the US Constitution, proves to meRead it for yourself.
Then look at these links.
Just before the 2008 election Barack Obama's election team spent $1.4 million blocking access to all of Obama's records.

Barack Hussein Obama II is UNCONSTITUTIONALLY QUALIFIED.
There were 8 attempts by Democrats to try to "Change the Qualification Rules" BEFORE Obama was elected.
They KNOW Obama's ILLEGAL ... AND .... UNQUALIFIED!

186 posted on 11/18/2015 8:06:33 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: Yosemitest
The issue has never been adjudicated in the courts. We need a definition of what constitutes a natural born citizen as mentioned in the Presidential eligibility qualifications in the Constitution. They didn't say citizen; they said "natural born."

Every president to date was either a citizen at the adoption of the Constitution in 1789 or born in the United States; of those in the latter group, every president except two (Chester A. Arthur and Barack Obama) had two U.S.-citizen parents.

Ted Cruz was born in a foreign country and had only one Amcit parent. He acquired Canadian citizenship at birth. Chester Arthur was born in Vermont to a Vermont-born mother and a father from Ireland, who was naturalized as a U.S. citizen in 1843, 14 years after Chester was born. Arthur tried to hide the fact that his father, though legally living in the US, was not a US citizen at the time of his birth.

The cases of Obama and Cruz are similar despite your protestations to the contrary. They point out the need to get a SCOTUS decision on the issue once and for all. I don't want the children of illegal aliens, tourists, or green card holders to be eligible for the Presidency. We need a legal definition of NBC as mentioned in the Constitution. You can't be intellectually honest by attacking Obama (correctly) and not expect Cruz to come under similar scrutiny.

On November 24 the state of NH will address the challenges to Cruz and Sanders being on the ballot in 2016. I expect NH to approve Cruz being on the ballot, but there will be other challenges. We need to resolve this issue in the courts ASAP.

188 posted on 11/18/2015 8:29:55 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson