Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

I suppose I just haven’t read enough, but it has always seemed strange to me that after the Romans retreated to south of the Danube the Romanians kept a Romance language, while the lands the Romans kept ultimately adopted Slavic languages.


5 posted on 11/03/2015 9:52:54 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker

Until the Turks came in from the east, the Bulgars were the major longterm enemy of the Byzantines. The western Balkans were lost to various groups in succession, what is now Romania (Romanian has lots of loanwords from Slavic languages, as well as French and German) had fluctuating borders. I remember Kurt Gowdy talking about how in Romania, the universal nod for yes, shake for no was reversed as a consequence of having Turkish blades up against their throats with the question, do you accept Allah? :’)

http://www.omniglot.com/writing/romanian.htm

http://www.omniglot.com/writing/bulgarian.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrace

http://www.byzantium1200.com/aquaduct.html


6 posted on 11/03/2015 10:17:33 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson