Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: exDemMom

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0047248480900512

It is a theory and probably not a very good one...............


42 posted on 12/02/2015 5:55:32 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: PeterPrinciple

Thank you.

That abstract implies that there is not a specific sexual dimorphism in teeth, but that tooth size is related to overall body size. And humans do show distinct size differences between males and females. That young man was probably smaller than average, leading to his initial misclassification as female.


55 posted on 12/02/2015 5:00:41 PM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson