Hillary sat in her pinkest pantsuit and confidently pronounced that claims of Bill’s infidelities were the product of a vast right wing conspiracy, nothing to see here. Soon thereafter, Bill had to admit that he had lied. In 2008, she and her little news media dogs told us she was the inevitable nominee and President. That came to “O”.
Hillary does have astoundingly chutzpah and discipline at projecting false confidence: she’s telling the truth (in the face of her multiple contradictory stories); she is an innocent victim of right wing attacks; she’s smart and accomplished; she has never ever done anything wrong; she shall be President.
It’s all hogwash, that works only because big media is in her thrall (a reality we can’t discount). I am not a Trump fan, but he is the Rep. candidate who projects more confidence than she does. Presumably because he has the discipline to focus first on winning the game he is in now, Trump has not yet attacked Hillary. If T is nominated, I expect he will deconstruct Hillary via the low-brow rhetoric the mass of voters can relate to. Balloons have a way of popping quickly. If he picks a female running mate, he will undermine Hillary’s edge with the vagina voters. Hillary will never be President.
Like what you have to say. I needed that.
Once small difference. I don’t think Trump (or whoever, probably Trump) needs a female running mate, especially not Fiorina.