You really are just going to repeat every argument you made (and I swatted down) in the other thread, aren't you? Contagious without fever present? Sure. But that doesn't mean contagious without any symptoms.
People are not contagious until they develop symptoms
I'll go with the people who study this stuff for a living (and who successfully prevented any outbreak in any developed country that was sending medical assistance to Africa last year), over people like you who spout chicken little nonsense (and who predicted a massive outbreak here). But if you want to think the sky is falling, then be my guest. You're wrong, but be my guest.
Fever not present in 12.9% of cases.
Means full blown Ebola without fever.
How hard is that to understand?