Skip to comments.
Fox News’s Kirsten Powers announces: “I’m becoming Catholic!”
Patheos ^
| October 9, 2015
| Deacon Greg Kandra
Posted on 10/12/2015 11:40:09 AM PDT by tioga
The news has been hurtling around the world tonight on Twitter:Welcome home, Kirsten.
TOPICS: Religion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300, 301-311 last
To: terycarl
Oh my gosh.
This thread still lives.
Yes, there have been anti-Catholics throughout history.
That doesn’t mean I have to voluntarily support it.
301
posted on
10/17/2015 5:57:35 PM PDT
by
sitetest
(If Roe is not overturned, now unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
To: daniel1212
So why do most RCs deny Jn. 6:53,54 as being literal? I don't and don't know anyone who does.
302
posted on
10/17/2015 5:57:47 PM PDT
by
terycarl
(COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVERALL!!)
To: MayflowerMadam
.
Socialistic, even. Some are heavy donors to Emilys list and Planned Parenthood. Kirsten will fit in fine. Shes chosen correctly considering her beliefs. Your hatred runs as deep as hers....such nonsense....planned parenthood......sigh.
303
posted on
10/17/2015 6:12:23 PM PDT
by
terycarl
(COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVERALL!!)
To: terycarl
So why do most RCs deny Jn. 6:53,54 as being literal? I don't and don't know anyone who does.
Then why did you fail to respond to my question? How can you hold that this statement is no less an absolute imperative then other "verily, verily" statements? IOW, yet affirm those who deny it as being born again children of God? Or are all such presently lost, and Lumen Gentium 16 does not apply to them? Be consistent in your error.
304
posted on
10/17/2015 6:48:23 PM PDT
by
daniel1212
(Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
To: HarleyD
you're not home or part of the Church unless you're a Catholic. If they follow Vatican I then you're not saved outside the Catholic church. If they follow Vatican II then you can, perhaps, be saved. But if one follows either, then "perhaps" is sadly unlikely.
305
posted on
10/17/2015 11:51:33 PM PDT
by
daniel1212
(Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
To: daniel1212
Agree. Sadly they do not see that both sides result in a works based religion.
306
posted on
10/18/2015 4:19:06 AM PDT
by
HarleyD
("... letters are weighty, but his .. presence is weak, and his speech of no account.")
To: daniel1212
Then why did you fail to respond to my question? Many of your questions, including this one, are mostly incoherent babbling and don't make a lot of sense.
307
posted on
10/18/2015 2:03:54 PM PDT
by
terycarl
(COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVERALL!!)
To: terycarl; HarleyD; BlueDragon; EagleOne; metmom; Elsie; redleghunter; kinsman redeemer
How can you hold that this statement [Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. (John 6:53)] is no less an absolute imperative then other "verily, verily" statements? IOW, yet affirm those who deny it as being born again children of God? Or are all such presently lost, and Lumen Gentium 16 does not apply to them? Be consistent in your error. Many of your questions, including this one, are mostly incoherent babbling and don't make a lot of sense.
Then you are either obtuse, ignorant or avoiding what would indict you. Take your pick.
308
posted on
10/18/2015 6:30:22 PM PDT
by
daniel1212
(Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
To: tgusa; daniel1212
No Catholic bashing. I will note some Catholics here questioned her stance on abortion not too long ago. She is a democrat and pro-choice.
So you have that to deal with.
309
posted on
10/18/2015 10:35:55 PM PDT
by
redleghunter
(Truly my soul waiteth upon God: from him cometh my salvation. He only is my rock and my salvation)
To: redleghunter
No Catholic bashing. I will note some Catholics here questioned her stance on abortion not too long ago. She is a democrat and pro-choice. Which make her feel more at home as a RC then as an evangelical, in the light of the testimony of the difference btwn the two.
310
posted on
10/19/2015 4:39:19 AM PDT
by
daniel1212
(Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
To: daniel1212
I will note this article calls her “anti abortion” but what does that mean? I remember hearing her say she is opposed to late term abortions and what Planned parenthood is doing to sell baby parts,; but have not seen her firmly declare she is pro Life.
I know when someone posted an article calling her evangelical, the Catholic consensus here was she was still pro-abortion.
So what exactly changed?
311
posted on
10/19/2015 1:39:16 PM PDT
by
redleghunter
(Truly my soul waiteth upon God: from him cometh my salvation. He only is my rock and my salvation)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300, 301-311 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson