Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

Now.
Now it takes 6 months.
Now it would not be profitable.
Now there are transportation issues.

Sewards Folly turned out to be a pretty good deal for us.

We need to stop looking backwards and being afraid to take a risk.


23 posted on 09/28/2015 5:35:22 PM PDT by RiseUpPatriots (Time for real change then we can have some hope! Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: RiseUpPatriots

One difference: Sewards Folly was ON THE LAND and not 42 million miles away in space.

Mining and transportation of ores was not a major problem and only took a few weeks at most to processing mills and/or assay offices.

The ores didn’t have to go through reentry in hugh metal capsules or ships.

Only if the ore ship could reach the ground would it be financially feasible to mine Mars, but what would be the valuable ores up there that we don’t have down here?

We don’t need iron ores, nickel, etc. from Mars as we have nice supplies out in New Mexico, Arizona and Minnesota.


25 posted on 09/28/2015 7:15:47 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson