To: 1raider1
Why was it OK to have Super Bowl I, V, X, but not L?
Rio Linda school systems.
9 posted on
09/27/2015 3:51:56 PM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Don Corleone
Why? See:
...would not have been aesthetically pleasing enough.
Finally, a BA degree comes in handy!
36 posted on
09/27/2015 4:08:44 PM PDT by
Ace's Dad
(Proud grandpa of a "Brit Chick" named Poppy Loucks (Call sign "Popsickle").)
To: Don Corleone
Rio Linda school systems.
Yep, “For those in Rio Linda”. LOL
40 posted on
09/27/2015 4:13:04 PM PDT by
laplata
( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
To: Don Corleone
Super Bowl L would mean "Super Bowl Large." We have already had Super Bowl Extra Large. Super Bowl Medium is hundreds of years in the future. There will never be a Super Bowl Small.
Instead of using Arabic numerals to replace the Roman numeral, they could have used the Greek numeral. That would be "nu" for 50, Super Bowl N.
To: Don Corleone
62 posted on
09/27/2015 5:31:39 PM PDT by
taterjay
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson