[CpnHook]

Idiot. That's *YOU* using the word "original."

That was me QUOTING Onaka's words. Notice in Post #235 where I state that "Onaka says" and then I put the words "the original Certificate of Live Birth" in quotation marks?

Here's another little tutorial for you, akin to the one I recently gave you on how to read statutory history (so you don't again make yourself out to be an idiot by citing to a statute not yet enacted at the time at issue). When a writer (in this case me) puts words in quotation marks, that's a sign that the enclosed words are the verbatim words of the speaker under discussion (in this case, Dr. Onaka ("Onaka says")). Simple enough for you? Or do I need to spoon feed this to you in even smaller portions?

You aren't Onaka.

But Onaka is Onaka, and I've even put under your nose a copy of the Verification Onaka caused to be issued which uses the term "the original Certificate of Live Birth" (which words just happen to match the words I quote in Post #235).

Here it is again:

Of all the stupid posturing and denials you've attempted, this is perhaps the most absurd and idiotic. The words "the original Certificate of Live Birth" are right there, you Dumb*ss.

[DiogenesLamp]

Again, Idiot. The usage of the word "original" is not in the proper context, as in "This is the original document."

That they have an "original record" or that the information "matches " an "original record" is immaterial to the point.

Until an official says "That is the ORIGINAL" document, everything else is a dodge.

Let me say it for you again. An Official has to certify:

that the above is a true and correct copy of the original record on file in the Hawaii State Department of Health.

Here's an example, because I know you need one.

Anything less allows for a replacement birth certificate, (created by adoption, etc.) or a birth certificate created by an unattended birth affidavit.

If they won't certify it as *THE* original document, then it is meaningless.