Thank you for that informative answer! It was quite insightful, and gave me a much better grasp of the various issues in question. After explaing a number of finer points involved in the BC/language parsing discussion [the kind of parsing that, incidentally, Bill Clinton turned into an art form, while his fellow pols took copious notes] you touched on one of my long time obot issues.
Namely, their obsessive compulsive, outright pathological need to compartmentalize. On this point, your analogy is SUPERB. I can’t recall how many pieces of incriminating evidence there were in Twelve Angry Men. It’s not relevant. What IS relevant is the practically unquantifiable # of issues, contradictions, conflicts, anomalies, black holes, abnormalities, irregularities, misdirection, sealed records and outright lies associated with Obama and his murky past. I doubt anyone has the time to amass them all, categorize them, and maintain an up to date list. The volume is simply staggering.
Yet here’s the thing. Normally an obot will tell you there are no problems of any kind with Obama’s past/history and records. But if a conservative pounds away at one of the issues to the point that not even the obots can deny it, they will smugly declaim to each other, “It’s all they’ve got.”
Then a few weeks or a month down the road, if a totally different issue gets pounded, guess what? They obots say, “Hehe—it’s all they’ve got.”
Iow, obots are incapable of storing ANY issue re Obama and his records, etc, in their minds/memories. Rather, their brains are like etch-a-sketches. Every time they are confronted with sufficient evidence to establish a problem, the whistle past the graveyard with, ‘it’s all they’ve got.’ Then they shake their etch-a-sketch and immediately forget that problem ever existed.
And so ad infinitum. If they had sharper minds with analytical capability, they wouldn’t be obots. As with your Twelved Angry Men analogy, they would quickly realize there are just too many issues, FAR too many. But given their instant-amnesia approach, their default is to see no problem at all, and only under duress do they even resort to, ‘it’s all they’ve got.’
I’ve said it before. No wonder they’re obots. With minds like that, what else could they be?
You're welcome, and yes it is a hodgepodge of competing possibilities. That's why it's so difficult for people to get their heads around it. They aren't certain about exactly what it is they ought to be looking for.
And so ad infinitum. If they had sharper minds with analytical capability, they wouldn’t be obots. As with your Twelved Angry Men analogy, they would quickly realize there are just too many issues, FAR too many. But given their instant-amnesia approach, their default is to see no problem at all, and only under duress do they even resort to, ‘it’s all they’ve got.’
I think it's fake amnesia. I think it's real and intentional pretending to forget.
I have been pounding the word "Original" for the last several years, and Cpn Hook seems to think he alone has just now thought of it. No, we've been looking for the word "Original" to appear in anything from Hawaii, and the word never seems to appear. Everything is "Abstract" or "In our Files" or any other sort of wording short of declaring it a copy of an original record.
I personally think they are trying to cover up, among other things, a ~1971-1972 adoption or guardianship.