Uhm, it's called a "policy paper."
Got any other asinine questions predicated on tin-foil conspiracy theories?
First of all, a policy paper is meaningless if you can't trust the person who commissioned it. Let me gues: You also trust McConnell and Boehner 100% too. Well, I find all three completely untrustworthy. You should too. Just having a ghostwriter spit out some drivel doesn't mean anything. I bet Trump couldn't even answer a quiz about what's in that paper.
Most importantly: That position paper was written without any understanding of conservative philosophy. Trump's people showed they don't understand conservative economics or the immigration problem AT ALL.
It's been mentioned many times on Free Republic in the past. The immigration issue is all about economics. The U.S. system incentivizes illegal immigration. That is 99% of the issue. As long as the U.S> is incentivizing illegal immigration, anything not addressing that fundamental issue will solve the problem. So right there, the people Trump hired get an "F" on understanding immigration. So, even if they had any intention of following through on that paper, it would be doomed to failure.
There was also another time bomb Trump's people put in there. The 60 million illegal immigrants ALREADY HERE are the bulk. The future flow of illegal immigrants will not match those already here. Trump has vacillated greatly, often saying he will let them stay here. He is trying to finesse the issue, but ultimately, he behind amnesty.
So, I think trump's position paper gets a well-deserved "F."