Sometimes leadership looks like it likes to be fed carrots and apples.
Posted on 09/18/2015 10:27:47 AM PDT by Steelfish
At the GOP Debate, Carly Fiorina Showed What True Leadership Looks Like
by MONA CHAREN September 18, 2015
The question dogs any woman who writes about politics: “Don’t you want to see the first woman elected president of the United States?” The unstated premise, always obvious, is that you are some sort of traitor to your sex if your hand isn’t itching to pull the lever for someone with the correct chromosomes. My answer has always been, “That depends upon what she believes.” Hillary Clinton banked on the First Woman President effect from the start — an understandable gambit for someone with no substantive accomplishments and many flaws. Her sex may be the only thing she hasn’t lied about. She doubtless lulls herself to sleep at night by lovingly eyeing the cross tabs of election data showing that women are an ever-increasing share of the total electorate (53 percent in 2012); that single women in particular lean hard to the Democrats (67 percent voted for Obama in 2012); and that marriage is on the decline among younger voters. Two things will disturb her reverie. One: In the past two months, according to an ABC News/Washington Post poll, Mrs. Clinton’s support among Democratic women voters has dropped by 29 points, from 71 percent to 42 percent. Two: Carly Fiorina demonstrates what a true leader looks like. Clinton has played the woman card until it’s dog-eared and faded.
Fiorina knows it’s useful to be the lone female in the Republican race, but like Margaret Thatcher, the figure she most resembles, her sex is the least interesting fact about her. Like Thatcher, Fiorina is self-made. She did not ride to success on a man’s coattails. Her rise from secretary to CEO would already be the stuff of legend if she were a Democrat. Also unlike Mrs. Clinton, Carly Fiorina seems to have actual beliefs, not poll-tested positions.
How long have Republicans yearned to see a candidate frame the abortion question as Mrs. Fiorina did at the CNN debate — daring Obama and Clinton to watch the video in which a former clinic worker described how a fully formed fetus, his heart beating, was killed by a technician who cut open his face to harvest his brain? That is the ground on which this battle must be fought.
The press and the Democrats would prefer to blow smoke about “women’s health” and, if pressed, to focus on rape and incest cases. It’s up to steely candidates to present the reality of abortion. Fiorina didn’t flinch from doing so.
Most of the candidates on stage at the Reagan Library have done their homework. Senator Marco Rubio was the standout, in my judgment, particularly on foreign policy (with Fiorina a close second), showing the fruits of careful analysis and long study of the strategic situation. Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, Chris Christie, Scott Walker, John Kasich, Rand Paul, Lindsay Graham, Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee, have all, to varying degrees, immersed themselves in policy and now offer the American people their considered views on the difficult (even dire) state of the nation.
She described defunding Planned Parenthood as challenge to the “character of this nation.” There’s another challenge that deserves mention. The people have a job to do as well, and so far this year, they have been shirking it. Their role is to take politics seriously — to reward merit and to shun mere flimflam men.
he two top-polling candidates are unfit. As much as Dr. Ben Carson is a winsome, admirable American (I’ve read his autobiography and seen the movie based upon it) and an ornament to the Republican party, he is clearly not sufficiently schooled in public policy to be a credible president.
Mr. Trump, a balloon held aloft by hot air, was asked how he would handle foreign policy. He declared that if he were elected, he’d study up. “I’ll know more about the problems of this world when I sit” in the Oval Office. Meanwhile, his instinct is to “get along with Putin.” If that sounds familiar, it should.
In 2008, Barack Obama promised to sit down with all of our adversaries. He did. The reset with Putin has led to Russian troops in Ukraine, Crimea, and now Syria. The détente with Iran threatens mushroom clouds from Tel Aviv to New York.
A Marco Rubio/Carly Fiorina ticket (or Fiorina/Rubio) could win in 2016. So could some other combinations. Democrats have not had this much to fear in more than a decade. Nor has their own slate been so vulnerable.
One of the real estate scion’s favorite insults is “loser” — an apt description of the Republican party if it fails to wake from the Trump coma. —
Mona Charen is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. © 2015 Creators.com
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/424211/carly-fiorina-republican-debate-hillary-clinton
LoL! Oh man....
The really think people are THAT stupid, do they?
The historic things only works with the left.
They invented it being significant, therefore control the usage, therefore she will not bee deemed worthy of the spot and will be dispatched with.
>> Her rise from secretary to CEO would already be the stuff of legend if she were a Democrat.
If it were actually true, that is.
According to her husband at the time, “secretary to CEO” is a myth.
“look at that face”...
heheheh
Any ticket with Hatchetface on it is one that no conservative should be voting for, ever. Her record speaks for itself and a well-scripted answer to one question at one well-scripted debate changes nothing.
You’re so vain, you probably think this propaganda is about you, Carly.
/sarc
Fiorina is on board The Cheap Labor Express. The only thing she will lead us to is losing our country.
Real leadership looks like a Botox robot who whines when people talk about her deformed face she bought ?
“Don’t you want to see the first woman elected president of the United States?”
No. I want to see the best person for the job get elected, whether it’s a man or woman is meaningless.
>>The historic things only works with the left.
The GOPe is the New Left. The Democrats are the Far Left.
Yeah, the “historic” thing won’t work for the GOPe, but they think that they’ve done enough for the Progs to be considered a part of the club now.
Mona gets it wrong again.
The leadership at the GOP debate was ...
Jake Tapper.
Leading, directing, succeeding, as evidenced by this very ‘result’.
She is not going to win the primary.
I really hope there isn’t this drumbeat for Fiorina now, but I think this is just the beginning. Yuck. I was kinda interested in her a few weeks back with the first interview I saw of her, but something about her doesn’t ring true to me. I think she’s a phony and ice cold and conservative of convenience.
“There was nothing remarkable about Carly’s performance.”
I think it’s remarkable that she could’ve endured the entire three-hour debate with that stick up her ass and after having sucked a dozen lemons. Pretty impressive.
Nice
Sometimes leadership looks like it likes to be fed carrots and apples.
“True leadership”
Would that be the part about running two companies into the ground, or the part about breaking US sanctions law to sell computers to the Iranians?
FioRINO is the GOPe’s Shillary..
i can’t stand Carly, but your post is erroneous - it wasn’t her child - it was her step child. It’s unfair to blame her for that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.