[Las Vegas Ron]

“Held: The Fourteenth Amendment requires a State to license a marriage between two people of the same sex and to recognize a marriagebetween two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-State.”

So what? You agree and defend it?

The 14th has nothing to do with this, and you know it.

Further more, the "judge" stated that the court supersedes God and Natures law, you agree with that too?

Wow dude, whose side are you on?

You can bow to your master, I will fight.

You have not argued the point that KY has no separation clause, curious that. The Fed cannot alter State law, KY marriage law was struck down in its entirety.

[Mr Rogers]

“So what? You agree and defend it?”

Well, given that I already told you: “Given their decision had zero legal reasoning and made no effort to apply the Constitution...”, MY thoughts are pretty clear.

“You have not argued the point that KY has no separation clause, curious that. The Fed cannot alter State law, KY marriage law was struck down in its entirety.”

No, that is NOT how it works. The only thing the court invalidated was a requirement that applicants be heterosexual. The marriage law was not struck down in its entirety. If you cannot figure that out, then I suggest you go find something to do besides post utter nonsense.