I guess I’m a little confused. I read that other clerks wanted to sign the licenses, but she wouldn’t let them? If this is her main issue and they were willing, then just what is her real motive?
I don’t think they wanted to sign the licenses. They were willing to issue the licenses, which have Davis’s pre-printed signature on them. By KY law it has to be her signature.
She needs relief from the KY Law to be able to issue a license that doesn’t have her signature of approval on it.
I think I read KY lawmakers are thinking about passing something.
After all of the threads on this you still haven’t caught the fact that Davis said she didn’t want her name on the certificates. That’s what this is about!
Apparently a lot of people are ignoring this simple fact as did judge Bunning.
Kentucky law requires the county clerk’s name on the cert to be valid, she said she didn’t want to endorse something against her morals or validate it by having her signature appear on the cert. No state law has changed here, this is just based on the supreme court’s edict that homosexual marriage is the law of the land because 5 of the black robed tyrants deemed it so.